Miner Collaterals

### Miner CollateralsState reliableTheory Audit n/aEdit this sectionsection-systems.filecoin_mining.miner_collaterals

Most permissionless blockchain networks require upfront investment in resources in order to participate in the consensus. The more power an entity has on the network, the greater the share of total resources it needs to own, both in terms of physical resources and/or staked tokens (collateral).

Filecoin must achieve security via the dedication of resources. By design, Filecoin mining requires commercial hardware only (as opposed to ASIC hardware) that is cheap in amortized cost and easy to repurpose, which means the protocol cannot solely rely on the hardware as the capital investment at stake for attackers. Filecoin also uses upfront token collaterals, as in proof-of-stake protocols, proportional to the storage hardware committed. This gets the best of both worlds: attacking the network requires both acquiring and running the hardware, but it also requires acquiring large quantities of the token.

To satisfy the multiple needs for collateral in a way that is minimally burdensome to miners, Filecoin includes three different collateral mechanisms: initial pledge collateral, block reward as collateral, and storage deal provider collateral. The first is an initial commitment of filecoin that a miner must provide with each sector. The second is a mechanism to reduce the initial token commitment by vesting block rewards over time. The third aligns incentives between miner and client, and can allow miners to differentiate themselves in the market. The remainder of this subsection describes each in more detail.

#### Initial Pledge CollateralState reliableTheory Audit n/aEdit this sectionsection-systems.filecoin_mining.miner_collaterals.initial-pledge-collateral

Filecoin Miners must commit resources in order to participate in the economy; the protocol can use the minersʼ stake in the network to ensure that rational behavior benefits the network, rewarding the creation of value and penalizing malicious behavior via slashing. The pledge size is meant to adequately incentivize the fulfillment of a sectorʼs promised lifetime and provide sufficient consensus security.

Hence, the initial pledge function consists of two components: a storage pledge and a consensus pledge.

$SectorInitialPledge = SectorInitialStoragePledge + SectorInitialConsensusPledge$

The storage pledge protects the networkʼs quality-of-service for clients by providing starting collateral for the sector in the event of slashing. The storage pledge must be small enough to be feasible for miners joining the network, and large enough to collateralize storage against early faults, penalties, and fees. The vesting of block rewards and the use of unvested rewards as additional collateral reduces initial storage pledge without compromising the incentive alignment of the network. This is discussed in more depth in the following subsection. A balance is achieved by using an initial storage pledge amount approximately sufficient to cover 7 days worth of Sector fault fee and 1 Sector fault detection fee. This is denominated in the number of days of future rewards that a sector is expected to earn.

$SectorInitialStoragePledge = Estimated20DaysSectorBlockReward$

Since the storage pledge per sector is based on the expected block reward that sector will win, the storage pledge is independent of the networkʼs total storage. As a result, the total network storage pledge depends solely on future block reward. Thus, while the storage pledge provides a clean way to reason about the rationality of adding a sector, it does not provide sufficient long-term security guarantees to the network, making consensus takeovers less costly as the block reward decreases. As such, the second half of the initial pledge function, the consensus pledge, depends on both the amount of quality-adjusted power (QAP) added by the sector and the network circulating supply. The network targets approximately 30% of the network’s circulating supply locked up in initial consensus pledge when it is at or above the baseline. This is achieved with a small pledge share allocated to sectors based on their share of the networkʼs quality-adjusted power. Given an exponentially growing baseline, initial pledge per unit QAP should decrease over time, as should other mining costs.

$SectorInitialConsensusPledge = 30\% \times FILCirculatingSupply \times \frac{SectorQAP}{max(NetworkBaseline, NetworkQAP)}$

#### Block Reward CollateralState reliableTheory Audit n/aEdit this sectionsection-systems.filecoin_mining.miner_collaterals.block-reward-collateral

Clients need reliable storage. Under certain circumstances, miners might agree to a storage deal, then want to abandon it later as a result of increased costs or other market dynamics. A system where storage miners can freely or cheaply abandon files would drive clients away from Filecoin as a result of serious data loss and low quality of service. To make sure all the incentives are correctly aligned, Filecoin penalizes miners that fail to store files for the promised duration. As such, high collateral could be used to incentivize good behavior and improve the networkʼs quality of service. On the other hand, however, high collateral creates barriers to miners joining the network. Filecoin’s constructions have been designed such that they hit the right balance.

In order to reduce the upfront collateral that a miner needs to provide, the block reward is used as collateral. This allows the protocol to require a smaller but still meaningful initial pledge. Block rewards earned by a sector are subject to slashing if a sector is terminated before its expiration. However, due to chain state limitations, the protocol is unable to do accounting on a per sector level, which would be the most fair and accurate. Instead, the chain performs a per-miner level approximation. Sublinear vesting provides a strong guarantee that miners will always have the incentive to keep data stored until the deal expires and not earlier. An extreme vesting schedule would release all tokens that a sector earns only when the sector promise is fulfilled.

However, the protocol should provide liquidity for miners to support their mining operations, and releasing rewards all at once creates supply impulses to the network. Moreover, there should not be a disincentive for longer sector lifetime if the vesting duration also depends on the lifetime of the sector. As a result, a fixed duration linear vesting for the rewards that a miner earns after a short delay creates the necessary sub-linearity. This sub-linearity has been introduced by the Initial Pledge.

In general, fault fees are slashed first from the soonest-to-vest unvested block rewards followed by the minerʼs account balance. When a minerʼs balance is insufficient to cover their minimum requirements, their ability to participate in consensus, win block rewards, and grow storage power will be restricted until their balance is restored. Overall, this reduces the initial pledge requirement and creates a sufficient economic deterrent for faults without slashing the miner’s balance for every penalty.

#### Storage Deal CollateralState reliableTheory Audit n/aEdit this sectionsection-systems.filecoin_mining.miner_collaterals.storage-deal-collateral

The third form of collateral is provided by the storage provider to collateralize deals. See the Storage Market Actor for further details on the Storage Deal Collateral.